[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Use of "claims to be DITA aware": Why I Said It Like That
Eliot, > > What do you mean by "judging" marketing claims? > > I may have missed this being a relative newcomer, > > but I didn't think the TC was planning to > > take an active role in judging conformance. > > The TC makes the law, it doesn't enforce it. > Glad to hear that. I thought it was unlikely, but since there was at least the implication in some of the messages in this thread, I thought the point should be explicitly addressed. Thanks again for the clarification. Dick --------------------------------- XML Press XML for Technical Communicators http://xmlpress.net (970) 231-3624 > -----Original Message----- > From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com] > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:39 PM > To: Dick Hamilton; Bruce Nevin (bnevin); dita > Subject: Re: [dita] Use of "claims to be DITA aware": Why I > Said It Like That > > > On 2/22/10 1:21 PM, "Dick Hamilton" <rlhamilton@frii.com> wrote: > > > Bruce and Eliot, > > > > A couple of points/questions: > > > > From Bruce: > >> > >> My thinking: A list of features is useful to vendors because > >> it helps to level the marketing field, but it is not essential > >> for the TC when it is called upon to judge partial conformance. > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >> This presumes that we do have a process in place that brings > >> vendors before us for judgement of their marketing claims > >> (there's that word). > >> > > What do you mean by "judging" marketing claims? I may have > missed this > > being a relative newcomer, but I didn't think the TC was planning to > > take an active role in judging conformance. > > The TC makes the law, it doesn't enforce it. > > It is the job of either users (i.e., "The DITA Community") or > some 3rd party > certification agency (which does not exist for DITA as far as > I know) to > judge whether or not a given processor that claims DITA > awareness does or > does not in fact conform. The most the TC can do is provide a > spec that > provides objective means by which conformance can be > determined by informed > users. > > This is part of our struggle with conformance (and why to > some degree it > didn't really matter that DITA had no conformance clause > before DITA 1.2): > the nature of DITA is that for many features there is an > inherent degree of > fuzziness as to what is or can be required. This is because > the nature of > DITA processing is ultimately in the service of producing > various outputs > and the nature of those outputs is necessarily determined by > the actor that > creates them. > > There are very few MUST statements in the spec, and most of > those relate to > addressing, which is one of the few clearly deterministic and > invariant > aspects of DITA processing. > > The most we can for most things is that if a processor does > something that > is covered by the DITA spec it should do it the way the spec says. > > Remember too that DITA is primarily a *data* standard, not a > *processing* > standard. That is, what is really important is consistency among DITA > *documents*, for which the rules are much clearer and much > easier to test. A > DITA vocabulary module either conforms or it doesn't and > documents that use > that vocabulary module are either valid or they're not. > > To that degree, DITA serves its purpose as helping to enable > and ensure data > interchange over the widest possible scope. > > Cheers, > > E. > > -- > Eliot Kimber > Senior Solutions Architect > "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" > Main: 610.631.6770 > www.reallysi.com > www.rsuitecms.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr > oups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]