[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] DITA 1.2 Review Comment: Thoughts on topicgroup, navtitle,and locktitle
On 8/27/2010 6:07 PM, Su-Laine Yeo wrote: BECDDDED92C3B949A38F5BC4BF56D21F03EFDA80@van-mail.jena.local" type="cite">In any case (this might have been said amongst the things that I don't understand), there are at least five possible ways to process the following markup: <topicref href="Topic_A.xml"> <topicgroup><topicmeta><navtitle>Group B</navtitle></topicmeta> <topicref href="Topic_B1.xml"/> <topicref href="Topic_B2.xml"/> <topicref href="Topic_B3.xml"/> </topicgroup> To this example, I would add a classic possible specialization, which for me puts some context on what the base behavior should be: <preface href="Topic_A.xml"> <body><topicmeta><navtitle>Group B</navtitle></topicmeta> <chapter href="Topic_B1.xml"/> <chapter href="Topic_B2.xml"/> <chapter href="Topic_B3.xml"/> </body>Here, I expect that the topicmeta/navtitle (however it got there) is meaningless in terms of the application, that groupness gave my processor a handle for logical processing of prefixes and page numbers for topics in its context, and that my results (in a ToC view) would be: Preface ... page iv Chapter 1. asdf ... page 1 Chapter 2. asdf ... page 7 Chapter 3. asdf ... page 13 Looks like case 2 to me. So in terms of application instances, when would case 1 or the others ever make sense? --
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
--T.S. Eliot
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]