RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 11 January 2011

["Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com>]

Yes, it shows the temporal sequence accurately, but that's confusing.
I'll move it with an explanatory note in brackets. And thanks for the
name fix. Amended minutes forthcoming.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:47 PM
> To: dita
> Subject: RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 
> 11 January 2011
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 2011 January 11 11:15
> > To: dita
> > Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 11 January
> > 2011
> > 
> 
> Re:
> 
> > 2. New ITEM: microXML and the future of DITA
> > 
> > o 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00004.html (Day)
> > 
> > Is this an issue that we need to track here? Discussion 
> indicates that 
> > although this is not an 'official' issue, there is 
> potential concern.
> > Web 2.0 Workgroup interested in watching it. If applications
> supporting
> > uXML are primarily oriented to HTML-5, will they preclude 
> DITA? The TC 
> > will leave this issue for the DITA for the web SC to monitor.
> > 
> > 3. New ITEM: Ruminations on the structure of the DITA Standard
> > 
> > o http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00009.html
> (Nitchie)
> > 
> > Consideration for DITA 2.0. Might make the uXML issue more 
> manageable.
> > Michael: uXML is proposal for . . .
> 
> > 
> > ACTION (Eliot): review to confirm that James is not doing anything 
> > that is unworkable.
> > 
> > ACTION (Dita for the Web SC): monitor this.
> 
> Most of the discussion (that I elided) under item 3 appears 
> really to be a discussion of item 2.  In particular, the two 
> actions are, I believe, in response to item 2.
> 
> I assume TC members who are interested in this 
> topic--especially those who want to monitor related 
> discussion--have seen my email at 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00007.html
> where I gave pointers to the W3C task force on this topic 
> (which includes James Clark and others).
> 
> 
> > 
> > 4. New ITEM: wiki.oasis-open.org pages in search results
> > 
> > o 
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201101/msg00010.html (Yeo)
> > 
> > o Discuss any further recommendations; Chairs to forward requests to
> Robin Cover
> > 
> > Michael: We don't want to put up barriers to search, openness is a 
> > critical value. We might reduce its ranking. Alternative: put a link
> at
> > the top of such pages pointing to the latest info. Don: this would 
> > raise the google search rank. Su-Laine: But you're right, clearer 
> > labeling is needed on these pages.
> > 
> > Rather than push old items down, we can pull official pages up in 
> > prominence, e.g. by adding links. Don: this is a problem for other 
> > standards in OASIS.
> > 
> > ACTION (Don, Kris): Forward discussion to Robert Carr for OASIS 
> > recommendation.
> 
> There may very well be a Robert Carr working for OASIS, but I 
> wonder if what was mean here is Robin Cover.
> 
> paul
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
> TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your 
> TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
> oups.php 
> 
>