OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [dita] SCs and work products [was: DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 March 2011]


Yes. "If a SC does the work, a usable work product can be created as a committee draft" is inspecific as to how much work is done by the SC and how much is done by the TC, but a committee draft by definition is a product of the TC. 

	/B

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:11 PM
> To: dita
> Subject: [dita] SCs and work products [was: DITA Technical 
> Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 March 2011]
> 
> [This is not a correction of the minutes.  It is a comment 
> about OASIS process inspired by something in the minutes.]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 2011 March 01 12:45
> > To: dita
> > Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 
> March 2011
> 
> Regarding:
> 
> >  9.  NEW ITEM: Vertical industry vocabulary in DITA 1.3
> 
> > This is related to the discussion that led to a proposal to 
> factorize 
> > into separate packages.  Either develop a base spec that is part of 
> > the DITA spec, or produce a delta spec that requires its 
> own approval 
> > process. Still very sympathetic to this, but the counter-arguments 
> > were compelling, and seem still to be effective. Kris: and 
> the OASIS 
> > approval process is more complex now, there's even more overhead.
> > 
> > Those who were not in that conversation were surprised at 
> the size of 
> > the 1.2 spec.
> > 
> > If a SC does the work, a usable work product can be created as a 
> > committee draft, and that will be adopted as a de facto standard. 
> > There shouldn't be an assumption that it will be part of 
> the core DITA 
> > standard.  If no one wants to own it, why should we do it?
> 
> Just to verify a part of the process:
> 
> Per my understanding, an SC can "do work", but they cannot 
> create a committee draft.  The parent TC is the only entity 
> that can create a deliverable of any kind.
> 
> So even if an SC does a bunch of work and creates some 
> documents, if the TC doesn't want to approve it as a TC work 
> product, nothing can be published.
> 
> I would not want to see an OASIS SC trying to make something 
> a de facto standard if the parent TC doesn't even approve of it.
> 
> paul
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
> TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your 
> TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
> oups.php 
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]