[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] SCs and work products [was: DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 March 2011]
Yes. "If a SC does the work, a usable work product can be created as a committee draft" is inspecific as to how much work is done by the SC and how much is done by the TC, but a committee draft by definition is a product of the TC. /B > -----Original Message----- > From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 2:11 PM > To: dita > Subject: [dita] SCs and work products [was: DITA Technical > Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 March 2011] > > [This is not a correction of the minutes. It is a comment > about OASIS process inspired by something in the minutes.] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 2011 March 01 12:45 > > To: dita > > Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 1 > March 2011 > > Regarding: > > > 9. NEW ITEM: Vertical industry vocabulary in DITA 1.3 > > > This is related to the discussion that led to a proposal to > factorize > > into separate packages. Either develop a base spec that is part of > > the DITA spec, or produce a delta spec that requires its > own approval > > process. Still very sympathetic to this, but the counter-arguments > > were compelling, and seem still to be effective. Kris: and > the OASIS > > approval process is more complex now, there's even more overhead. > > > > Those who were not in that conversation were surprised at > the size of > > the 1.2 spec. > > > > If a SC does the work, a usable work product can be created as a > > committee draft, and that will be adopted as a de facto standard. > > There shouldn't be an assumption that it will be part of > the core DITA > > standard. If no one wants to own it, why should we do it? > > Just to verify a part of the process: > > Per my understanding, an SC can "do work", but they cannot > create a committee draft. The parent TC is the only entity > that can create a deliverable of any kind. > > So even if an SC does a bunch of work and creates some > documents, if the TC doesn't want to approve it as a TC work > product, nothing can be published. > > I would not want to see an OASIS SC trying to make something > a de facto standard if the parent TC doesn't even approve of it. > > paul > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS > TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your > TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr > oups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]