From: Don Day (LbW) [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 12 April 2011
On 4/12/2011 11:48 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 2011 April 12 11:21
Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 12 April
3. ITEM: Perceptions that DITA is complex
(Stan Doherty, Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:28:35 -0500 -- recent e-mail on
(Paul Grosso, 22 Feb 2011 13:13:41 -0500 -- scroll down to bottom of
o Wiki page: "What do people (really) mean when they say "DITA is
Don: What do we want to accomplish here? We can continue taking
input, but when do we start formulating actions? Su-Laine: We could
start a new section of the wiki on solutions to the problem. Michael:
cross-refer solutions to problems. Kris: some solutions are already in
the page. Michael: yes, we should abstract them out.
Michael, Paul: DITA lite has relevance. . . .
Just a minor point, but I didn't say anything on this topic today.
I'm not sure who other than Michael was part of the DITA Lite
but it wasn't me.
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
Thanks, Paul--noted that you were not in on that discussion. During the "too complex" discussion. Michael made the point that "DITA Lite" (topic DTD with few/no domains) was contributed as part of the DITA 1.2 packaging.
What "DITA Lite" entails, however, is a separate discussion that I'll open in a new email. For the sake of the minutes, the statement above should correct what was said today.
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"