[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: <data> use practice question: @value and content?
For a client I need to capture dates where the date as original authored could be e.g. "Monday Dec 6, 2011". I need to retain the date as authored but also need to capture a machine-processible date string, e.g., an ISO date. The date is metadata for the topic so I'm capturing it using <data> within the topic prolog. My initial instinct is to use the <data> content for the original string and @value for the machine-processible date. My question: is this use of both @value and direct content condoned by DITA? I reviewed the reference entry for <data> and didn't see anything that suggested one way or the other. The alternative would be to have to two <data> instances, one for the display date and one for the normalized date, but I was hoping to avoid that since it's semantically the same date, just represented as two different but equivalent strings. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]