[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] DITA backlash
Bob, I appreciate you pointing out the definition of topic used by Information Mapping, and I agree that DITA can model that use of “topic” if used appropriately.
And I also agree wholeheartedly that DITA is a TOOL, not a methodology. I think that is a crucial distinction missed by many who enter the DITA world without proper grounding in the principles of structured writing. However, I will agree with Ms. Haworth that DITA does not make developing well-structured content particularly easy. But perhaps the blame for that is the tool-development
community. So many of the authoring tools seem to focus on topic writing but do not adequately provide the means for incorporating those topics into meaningful structure. Just supporting a DITA map view is not enough in my opinion. As much as I hate to admit it, I’m very happy to see Adobe’s commitment to supporting DITA authoring in FrameMaker (and I’m not saying that I think they haven’t
made mistakes, just that they seem to be making an honest effort). Regards, Mike Mike Austin Content Information Architect AISG Information Development Systems & Methodologies Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Office +1 512 895 8910 mike.austin@freescale.com This e-mail, and any associated attachments have been classified as: [X] Public [ ] Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use Only [ ] Freescale Semiconductor Confidential Proprietary From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Bob Thomas Hi Kris, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:
Skype: bob.thomas.colorado Instant messaging: Gmail chat (bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com) or Skype Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]