[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded
Jirka, My reading of the 10/2012 HTML5 spec is that <ruby> may have either text or <ruby> as its first child, followed by any number of <rt> and <rp> elements, as specified in this RNC pattern: ruby.content = ((text | ruby), (rp | rt)*) Is that your understanding of the current rules? That is, that the text to which the parent <ruby> applies may itself have a nested ruby annotation. (For readers not yet familiar with RNC notation, "text" is a keyword corresponding to #PCDATA in DTD syntax, but in RNC patterns the use of "text" does not require the use of a repeating OR group as for DTDs, so you can specify precisely where text content is an isn't allowed. Do not confuse the RNC keyword "text" with the DITA element type <text>".) Cheers, E. On 10/21/12 2:22 PM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 21.10.2012 19:40, Eliot Kimber wrote: >> Submitter's message >> Updates to address all TBDs > > Hi, > > please note that HTML5 allows nesting of ruby elements to express double > annotations: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#the-ruby-element > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19214 > > Ruby domain proposal seems to prohibit such usage and is thus unable to > capture all Ruby use-cases. > > Jirka -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]