[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Review of 13116, 13117, 13031
Requiring MathML for overline would be a lot of overhead when it seems like an obvious parallel with underline and line-through. That is, adding overline completes the under/middle/over trilogy. Cheers, E. On 7/5/13 6:01 PM, "JoAnn Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com> wrote: > Hi Eliot, > 13116 and 13117 look fine. Question: why wouldn't overline in 13031 be handled > in MathML? > > JoAnn > > JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD > President > Comtech Services Inc. > 710 Kipling Street, Suite 400 > Denver, CO 80215 > Joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com > 303-232-7586 > > -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]