[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Re: Here is a new version of the Ruby proposal
The discussion we had at last-week's meeting was that it's not a big deal to leave the Ruby proposal out of DITA 1.3 since we can provide it through other channels, such as DITA for Publishers, where I can maintain it in sync with the HTML5 design as it changes. Cheers, E. On 8/19/13 11:38 AM, "JoAnn Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com> wrote: > Hi All, > As chair of the Translation Subcommittee, I sent this notice to several > members. Felix Sasaki from Japan responded to the Ruby proposal. I did sent > this note to Eliot when I received it. > > Would everyone please consider Felix's comments when we decide what to do > about the ruby proposal. > > Best, > JoAnn > > JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD > President > Comtech Services Inc. > 710 Kipling Street, Suite 400 > Denver, CO 80215 > Joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com > 303-232-7586 > > CIDM will be hosting the Best Practices Conference in Savannah, Georgia > September 16-18. More information at: > http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/bestpractices/2013/index.htm > <http://www.infomanagementcenter.com/bestpractices/2013/index.htm> > > > > From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> > Date: Friday, August 9, 2013 5:48 AM > To: JoAnn Hackos <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com> > Cc: Andrzej Zydron <azydron@xml-intl.com>, "Rodolfo M. Raya" > <rodolfo@heartsome.net> > Subject: Re: Here is a new version of the Ruby proposal > > Dear JoAnn, all, > > apologies for the late reply, due to holiday and travel. I shared this within > the W3C i18n working group. There was no official review (again due to absence > of people), but some people stated the same opinion: the DITA ruby proposal > looks like aligned with the HTML ruby definition. But that Ruby definition in > HTML5 is not stable yet, so it might be a good approach to postpone Ruby in > DITA until final Ruby solution is created for HTML5. > > To decide about this, it also might be relevant for you that the ePub > community working in IDPF and in W3C in the new digital publishing interest > group > http://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/ > is also closely aligning with HTML5 in this area (and others). For ease the > adaptation of generation workflows DITA > HTML or DITA > ePub3 (=based on > HTML5), the alignment might help as well. > > Below are some links about the work currently going on around the Ruby > revision. Let me know if you have more questions. > > > 1) > Requirements for Japanese Text Layout > http://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/ > Particularly relevant sections include: > http://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#ruby_and_emphasis_dots > and > http://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#positioning_of_jukugoruby > > > > 2) > HTML Ruby Markup Extensions spec > http://darobin.github.io/html-ruby/ > > > 3) > Use Cases & Exploratory Approaches for Ruby Markup > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-ruby-use-cases-20120710/ > latest editor's draft at http://www.w3.org/International/docs/ruby/ > > 4) No 3) references "Ruby extension markup" > http://www.w3.org/International/notes/ruby-extension/ > which provides various examples of use of ruby that can be used as a starting > point for testing and documenting > > Best, > > Felix > > > Am 24.07.13 16:40, schrieb JoAnn Hackos: >> Eliot Kimber corrected the formatting. >> >> JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD >> President >> Comtech Services Inc. >> 710 Kipling Street, Suite 400 >> Denver, CO 80215 >> Joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com >> 303-232-7586 >> >> > -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]