Re: [dita] Revised version of proposal 13119: SVG Domain

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@rsicms.com>]

That change is actually driven by the RNG proposal, I’m just working
against the same local copy of the topic. So that change is actually not
part of the SVG proposal.

I’ll update my @rev marking to reflect. I wasn’t sure what the expected
values where. I also used Oxygen change tracking in the source, if that
helps.

Cheers,

E.
-- 
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com




On 11/16/13, 4:12 PM, "Kristen James Eberlein"
<kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:

>Hi, Eliot.
>
>I appreciate the work you have done here.
>
>I went through the DITA source for the "Specializing foreign or unknown
>content" that you had revised, and I applied values for the @rev
>attribute, so that we could see where you had made changes. (DITA source
>and XHTML output attached.)
>
>In addition to the modified examples, you've added a section on "Foreign
>or unknown content, element type name conflicts, and namespaces." Has
>this been reviewed by the proposal reviewers -- Nancy Harrison and Deb
>Bissantz?
>
>Best,
>Kris
>
>Kristen James Eberlein
>Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
>Co-chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
>Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee
>www.eberleinconsulting.com
>+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
>
>On 11/16/2013 8:51 AM, Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> I have updated this proposal to add updates to the examples under the
>> Foreign Specialization topic to reflect the proposed SVG and MathML
>> domains (I have a separate action out of the RNG proposal to add an RNG
>> example to that same topic but I’ll handle that through that proposal).
>>
>> I search the spec for all mentions of SVG and the foreign specialization
>> topic was only place that needed to have anything done to it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Eliot
>