Re: Question about another learning element

[john_hunt@us.ibm.com]

Hi Robert,

Thanks #2!

The IEEE LOM value list for Learning
Resource Type includes lecture, so I recommend keeping it in the schemas
and adding it to the list of values in the spec.

John

___________________________________
John Hunt
Senior Technical Content Architect 
IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence




From:      
 Robert D Anderson/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
To:      
 dita <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc:      
 John Hunt/Cambridge/IBM
Date:      
 02/17/2014 10:11 PM
Subject:    
   Question about
another learning element

---

This time it is the element lomLearningResourceType:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/v1.2/os/spec/langref/lomInteractivityType.html

According to the specification, these
are the legal values for the @value attribute: 
(Exercise | Simulation | Questionnaire
| Diagram | Figure | Graph | Index | Slide | Table | Narrative Text | Exam
| Experiment | ProblemStatement | SelfAssesment,  -dita-use-conref-target)

In the DTD/XSD implementation, the values
are:
exercise, simulation, questionnaire,
diagram, figure, graph, index, slide, table, narrativetext, exam, experiment,
problemstatement, selfassessment, lecture, or -dita-use-conref-target

Apart from the case issues and one word
/ two word issues, the DTD and XSD have a value of "lecture"
that is not valid according to the spec. So the question is - do we add
the value "lecture" to the specification as a valid value, or
do we list it in the specification as an errata in the DTD/XSD?

Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/)