[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: Re: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain
|
Best,
Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) -------- Original Message --------
Hi Kris and L&T members - Based on the inputs received, the consensus is to not include the Release Mgt Domain in the default content models for the L&T topics and maps, and treat as optional in the same way that the other tech-comm domains are optional. Thanks. John ___________________________________ John Hunt Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-Committee Senior Technical Content Architect IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence 4502 S. Miami Blvd, Durham, NC 27703 john_hunt@us.ibm.com From: "Myers, Mark" <mark.myers@sap.com> To: "Burgess, Doug" <doug.burgess@sap.com> Cc: "john_hunt@us.ibm.com" <john_hunt@us.ibm.com>, "dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org" <dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org>, Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: 03/19/2014 01:23 PM Subject: Re: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain Sent by: <dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org> Hi All from sunny Germany, I agree with Doug and John, that would be consistent with the approach for the other domains. Cheers Mark On Mar 19, 2014, at 5:24 PM, "Burgess, Doug" <doug.burgess@sap.com> wrote: Hello, I’m inclined to agree with John. Let users add the domain if they have a use-case for it. It helps maintain the simplicity of L&T, (or at least the appearance of it ;-) if adopters see a relatively uncluttered core implementation. Best Regards, Doug ======================================= Doug Burgess Business Platform Management and Operations Knowledge & Enablement Solutions, SAP Canada doug.burgess@sap.com Work: 604-974-2334 Mobile: 778-840-8004 Vancouver BC Canada From: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of john_hunt@us.ibm.com Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8:01 AM To: dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: Kristen James Eberlein Subject: [dita-learningspec] Learning content and the Release mgt domain Dear L&T Sub-committee members and list - DITA 1.3 will include a new "Release management domain," which is described in this Stage 3 proposal - https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/50971/13102_Stage3Proposal.pdf. Essentially, this domain is included with the Technical-content domain elements and provides additional metadata elements (11 by my count) for tracking content changes, including the person, organization, summary of the change, and key dates. Kris has asked if we want it included or not with the default content models for the L&T topics. My personal take is that since the default L&T content models do not include the other Tech-content domains, such as programming or software elements, or the new equation, mathml, and svg domains, that we keep the Release mgt domain optional as well. This leaves it to the implementers to decide, based on the content types and mgt systems they use. What do others think? Please get back to me with your input by the end of the day this Friday if possible, so we can get back to the Kris and the TC with a recommendation. Thanks much in advance! John ___________________________________ John Hunt Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-Committee Senior Technical Content Architect IBM Collaboration Solutions | User Experience: Design and Information Excellence 4205 S. Miami Blvd, Durham, NC 27703 john_hunt@us.ibm.com |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]