I found the following discrepancies between the RNG model and DTD model that was approved in feature 13097, troubleshooting topic:
The content model for remedy is missing an optional title element and the steps-informal element
The remedy.content group should be defined as follows:
<define name="remedy.content">
<optional>
<ref name="title"/>
</optional>
<optional>
<ref name="responsibleParty"/>
<ref name="steps-unordered"/>
<ref name="steps-informal"/>
Missing spectitle attribute on specializations of section
The definitions for cause.attributes, condition.attributes, and remedy.attributes are each missing an optional spectitle attribute. In each case, the attributes should be defined in RNG as follows:
<attribute name="spectitle"/>
<attribute name="outputclass"/>
Approved feature contains a non-valid attribute specification for responsibleParty
The DTD model in the approved feature defines the responsibleParty attributes as follows:
<!ENTITY % responsibleParty.attributes
"name CDATA #IMPLIED"
>
The DTD model derived from the RNG is as follows:
<!ENTITY % responsibleParty.attributes
outputclass CDATA #IMPLIED"
In an earlier draft, responsibleParty inherited from the <data> element, so the @name attribute worked. Later, responsibleParty was changed to inherit from the <p> element. @name is not available on <p>, unfortunately, this went unnoticed. Consequently, the approved model is not valid. The current implementation in the RNG is reasonable, and it should be used instead of the approved model.
Best Regards,
--
Bob Thomas
+1 720 201 8260
Skype: bob.thomas.colorado
Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7)