OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Fwd: Re: [dita-comment] 1.3 troubleshooting topic permits empty remedy element?

See the e-mail from George Bina below.


Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [dita-comment] 1.3 troubleshooting topic permits empty remedy element?
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:17:59 +0300
From: George Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
To: dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org

Not an answer but an additional question on the same subject:

The troubleshooting element allows task as its last child

and that task allows topic as its last child

Can someone clarify what should the actual content model should be?

Best Regards,
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger

On 01/04/15 11:55, Joe Pairman wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a question about the DITA 1.3 troubleshooting topic, and I'm
> sending it to dita-comment because I'm not sure how (if at all) this
> question fits in the 1.3 review process.
> Working with the experimental org.dita.troubleshooting plugin bundled
> with Oxygen 16.1, I noticed something about the content model for the
> remedy element. It can be empty, but if it has /any/ content, it must
> have one of steps, steps-unordered, or steps-informal.
> Is this intentional? Might there be a situation where an empty remedy
> element is useful just to hang attributes on? If not, perhaps it would
> be easier all round to disallow empty remedy elements. Here's the
> relevant part of the DTD; removing the trailing question mark would
> disallow the empty element.
> |<!—                    LONG NAME: Remedy                          —>
> <!ENTITY % remedy.content
>                         “((%title;)?, (%responsibleParty;)?,
>                           (%steps; |
>                             %steps-unordered; |
>                             %steps-informal;)
>                          )?”
> Thanks for any info or thoughts.
> Joe

This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: dita-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: dita-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: dita-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita
Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]