Re: [dita] Should ditabase include troubleshooting?

Eliot's observation about the proposal not specifying adding troubleshooting to ditabase is correct. That was an oversight on my part. I would like to see it included with ditabase. I suspect that the rest of the tech-comm subcommittee feels the same way. But, to be sure, I will bring this to the attention of the tech-comm list.

Best Regards,

Bob

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Helfinstine, David <dhelfinstine@ptc.com> wrote:

Greetings,

Adding discussion to a wider audience. I would propose/agree that troubleshooting be included.

Thanks.

-Dave H.

Dave Helfinstine
dhelfinstine@ptc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@contrext.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 8:01 AM
To: Helfinstine, David
Subject: Re: [dita] Should ditabase include troubleshooting?

The troubleshooting proposal did not specify adding that topic type to ditabase. But it seems reasonable to include it since ditabase includes all the Tech Comm topic types.

Cheers,

E.
—————
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com

On 4/7/15, 4:39 PM, "Helfinstine, David" <dhelfinstine@ptc.com> wrote:

>Eliot,
>
>There is the new troubleshooting topic type based on topic. Should this
>be included in the DITA 1.3 ditabase composite topic type? Is there a
>reason it should or should not?
>
>Thanks.
>
>-Dave H.
>
>Dave Helfinstine
>dhelfinstine@ptc.com
>
>

Bob Thomas

+1 720 201 8260

Skype: bob.thomas.colorado

Instant messaging: Gmail chat (bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com) or Skype

Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7)

dita message