[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Another graphic question
Thanks Eliot. I may ping you with a revision idea this week. mag -----Original Message----- From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@contrext.com] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 5:15 PM To: Tom Magliery; DITA TC Subject: Re: [dita] Another graphic question That's my picture, Tom. 1: I think the idea was that the constraint module is likely to be specific to the shell or created by the shell creator, rather than something you get from a 3rd party. While the TC provides a couple of constraint modules, that's only because we needed them for backward compatibility. Normally constraints would be very specific to your local requirements. 2. Yes. Again, I think my idea was that the middle was the domain of the shell owner, while the right column is invariant modules and the left column is document instances. I was also probably trying to avoid having 4 columns just to have somewhere to put the constraint module. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber, Owner Contrext, LLC http://contrext.com On 7/27/15, 6:36 PM, "Tom Magliery" <dita@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of tom.magliery@justsystems.com> wrote: >Who created, or at least fully understands, this diagram? >http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csprd01/part3-all-inclusive/a rch >Spec/base/document-type-shells.html > >I'm having trouble understanding two things, and I want to improve them >in the revision. Actually the two things are kinda both the same thing. > >1. Is the constraint module deliberately blue (same as the DTD)? > >2. Are the labels across the top meant to apply vertically to the rest of >the components? I.e. is the constraint module considered to be "part of" >the document-type shell? (It does seem correct to me that domain modules >and structural modules are both considered "vocabulary modules".) > >mag >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]