Re: [dita] Why Three Editions paper reviews

[Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>]

I think everyone needs to take a look, and we can hold this open for another week for that.

If you don't want to make extensive comments, simple read the PDF and add a note to the DITAweb stating that you have read the committee not and have no comments.

People are going to read this, and we need to ensure that we, as the TC, are making the correct statements. Thanks.

Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

On 10/16/2015 3:06 PM, Tom Magliery wrote:

A couple more people have added comments to the Why Three Editions paper review on DITAweb this week. Thanks to Chris and JoAnn for that.

 

If anyone else would like to have a review, please do so. I don't recall if we've said when we would "close" this review, but we want to keep this moving, so it would be wise to get your comments in sooner, not later.

 

Did anyone look at the charts I created for use in a completely refactored "Growth of DITA" topic? The idea is to eliminate the tables, which are hard to understand. The text of the topic would be adjusted to fit better with the charts. Here are the charts:

http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/dita/committee-notes/editions/resources/charts_and_graphs_DRAFT.png

 

mag