RE: [dita] Why Three Editions paper reviews

Oh sorry,

Tom, I’ve misspelled.

-T

From: Tetsuya Sekine [mailto:ecmp@infoparse.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 8:10 AM
To: 'Tom Magliery'; 'DITA Technical Committee'
Subject: RE: [dita] Why Three Editions paper reviews

Hi Tim and Kris,

I’m not in the review members but your charts look good.

I did two DITA 1.3 introduction presentations at JTCA TC Symposiums in Tokyo (August) & Kyoto (last week) .

This information is always a good starting point. I should have those charts though Tom. This backed up the information that I also wanted to provide to the attendees.

Tetsuya - Mr.DITA Japan

From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Tom Magliery
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 4:06 AM
To: DITA Technical Committee
Subject: [dita] Why Three Editions paper reviews

A couple more people have added comments to the Why Three Editions paper review on DITAweb this week. Thanks to Chris and JoAnn for that.

If anyone else would like to have a review, please do so. I don't recall if we've said when we would "close" this review, but we want to keep this moving, so it would be wise to get your comments in sooner, not later.

Did anyone look at the charts I created for use in a completely refactored "Growth of DITA" topic? The idea is to eliminate the tables, which are hard to understand. The text of the topic would be adjusted to fit better with the charts. Here are the charts:

http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/dita/committee-notes/editions/resources/charts_and_graphs_DRAFT.png

mag

dita message