[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] key names
A key scope name has the same rules as a key name.
Periods are allowed in key scope and key names to allow maximum flexibility to map designers reusing topics with keyrefs initially authored in a scoped environment. We want to make it as easy as possible for map authors to reuse topics containing (possibly) (sometimes) scoped key references.
For example, if a topic contained
That topic might be reused in
From: <firstname.lastname@example.org> on behalf of Jim Tivy <email@example.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM
To: 'Eliot Kimber' <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: [dita] key names
On URIs the only thing DITA can do is make them IRIs in the future – if the escaping is upwardly compatible.
How about disallowing “.” in keyscope names? Where is the definition of what makes a keyscope name?