[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Radu's question and analysis of subjectScheme content in the DITA 1.3 spec
I'm pretty sure I agree with this analysis. Cheers, E. From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [dita] Radu's question and analysis of subjectScheme content in the DITA 1.3 spec I've read through both the Language Reference and ArchSpec topics carefully (and found a few glitches, which I've sent to the list). I think we clearly and consistently make the following points:
Given Radu's example: !DOCTYPE
subjectScheme PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DITA Subject Scheme Map//EN"
"subjectScheme.dtd">
I think processors need to resolve the key reference to "floatLeft" in place and so interpret the bound set of controlled values as follows: <subjectdef
keys="outputclassFig"> Note that the category value "outputclassFig" is not a permitted values for @outputclass. Should we add this as an example to the DITA 1.3 errata? --
Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]