Based on conversations with Carlos Evia, Alan Houser, and Robert
Anderson, I made revisions to the LwDITA committee note.
Alan or others, can you do a sanity check?
Tom, your e-mail hit the list after I'd done the rework. I think
"markup structures" is a better (and more accurate) way to refer
to "LwDITA components".
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 1/18/2018 2:38 PM, Robert D Anderson
wrote:
Regarding this comment from Kris:
> I think
changing instances of the word "elements" to "components"
makes this document read VERY strangely. I am not on-board with this change,
especially when the references are to XDITA or XDITA.
I assume that was meant to say XDITA or HDITA,
which both have elements. But beyond that ... I think I have
to agree that while "components" sounds accurate conceptually,
when I read it in context, it's kind of jarring. That's
especially true where we refer to "a subset of components in
DITA 1.3" and I thought DITA 1.3 components were literally the
different packages + grammar zip -- see the usage under
"Additional artifacts":
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part1-base/dita-v1.3-errata01-os-part1-base-complete.html
There are a few other uses -- our terminology
topic lays out terms that "define components of the DITA
standard". There's an actual element named <component>.
Almost all remaining uses in the spec are part of examples,
mostly for the delayed-conref-resolution domain. There is only
one other instance I can find that seems more in line with the
usage in the committee note, in the topic about single
sourcing, which refers to "document components including
paragraphs, lists, and tables":
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part1-base/archSpec/base/single-sourcing.html#single_sourcing
Kristen
James Eberlein ---01/18/2018 01:21:58 PM---The subtitle should
be "Committee Note 01" The date needs to be the date on which
the TC will vote o
From: Kristen
James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>
To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 01/18/2018
01:21 PM
Subject: [dita]
Feedback about "Lightweight DITA: An Introduction"
change-marked draft
Sent by: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
- The subtitle should be "Committee Note 01"
- The date needs to be the date on which the TC will vote on
the committee note: 23 January 2018
- The file name should be "LwDITA-v1.0-cn01". (The easiest
way to handle this is to rename the DITA map.)
- In "Specification URIs":
- The content currently in "This version" should move
to "Previous version".
- The URLs for "This version" need to be as follows
(changes indicated in red):
- Use symbols for the revision
marking, in addition to color. This is important for TC
members who are color blind or who are printing the
document out on a black and white printer. I'd look at the
DITAVAL files that we use for the errata version of the
spec.
- There are extra spaces before some
instances of the word "component".
- I think changing instances of the
word "elements" to "components" makes this document read
VERY strangely. I am not
on-board with this change, especially when the
references are to XDITA or XDITA.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 1/18/2018 1:21 PM, Carlos Evia wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
|