[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] ditabase
I can’t agree with the assertion that ditabase is obsolete—it has a necessary utility—Robert provided some compelling use cases from IBM (e.g., 100s of small message topics organized together in a single <dita> document). I’ve definitely seen the ditabase document type abused as a way to avoid creating local shells because it allows unrestricted topic type nesting—I find that distasteful but it’s not exactly wrong, even if it is a big misguided. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Magliery Tom <tom.magliery@justsystems.com> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Jim Tivy <jimt@bluestream.com> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]