[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] DITA 2.0 proposal: allow example in more contexts
Indeed, which is why my first suggestion was to use something akin to <note>. It may still be useful to have a formal <title>, so perhaps something akin to <fig> is more appropriate? Thanks, --Scott From:
Bob Thomas <bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com> Hi Scott, One immediate problem I can see is an increase in processor complexity. One way to look at the current model is that body.cnt can be regarded as an implicit section without a container that only optionally occurs
at the beginning of body. Under your proposal, processors would have to make this inference throughout the body content model with blocks now being interspersed between sections. Perhaps what you really want is a block-level example element. Best regards, Bob On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@jeppesen.com> wrote:
-- Bob Thomas +1 720 201 8260 Skype: bob.thomas.colorado Instant messaging: Gmail chat (bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com) or Skype Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]