Re: <fallback> (was Re: [dita] Updated status of DITAweb review of multimedia domain -- Deadline 05 August 2019)

[Alan Houser <arh@groupwellesley.com>]

Sure, but the multimedia domain is intended to be compatible with DITA 
1.3, no? And we will publish the multimedia domain as a committee note? 
Or is this review specific to the DITA 2.0 spec?

On 7/30/19 10:08 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote:
> Hi, Alan.
>
> <fallback> is not in DITA 1.3.
>
> It is in DITA 2.0, but in the base -- not part of the multimedia domain.
>
> Look in the PDFs of the DITA 2.0 draft spec.
>
> Best,
> Kris
>
> Kristen James Eberlein
> Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
> Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
> www.eberleinconsulting.com
> +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
>
> On 7/30/2019 10:05 PM, Alan Houser wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm missing something, but I see no mention of <fallback> in 
> > the 1.3 spec w/errata. Nor does it appear in the "All DITA elements, 
> > A to Z" topic --
> >
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part3-all-inclusive.html 
> >
> >
> > http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata02/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/quick-reference/all-elements-a-to-z.html#alldita1.2element_a_to_z 
> >
> >
> > This observation motivated my DITAweb comment.
> >
> > -Alan
> >
> > On 7/30/19 7:02 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote:
> > > Absence of a <fallback> topic -- <fallback> is part of the base and 
> > > not the multimedia domain!
--
Alan Houser
Group Wellesley, Inc.
Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing
arh on Twitter
412-450-0532