Re: [dita] Questions regarding âthings you pressâ

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>]

For question 2, migration, I would say that no migration is required. So far migration has focus on changes that are required in order to make existing documents or grammars conforming with 2.0. Anything else I think falls under the category of "this is new, you might want to use it", which is covered by the "new in this version" information we always provide.

Cheers,

E.

--
Eliot Kimber
http://contrext.com
 

ïOn 9/9/19, 7:20 PM, "Zoe Lawson" <dita@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of zoelawson17@hotmail.com> wrote:

    Iâm still working through the second stage proposal for things you press. 
    Original email https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201906/msg00033.html 
    draft proposal here: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/dita/trunk/DITA-2.0/stage-2/Issue257-thingToPress.dita
    
    
    As Iâm working through some of the review comments on the stage two proposal, Iâm coming across bigger questions. 
    
    
    1. Where to put it. 
    Iâm contemplating dumping it in the software domain, but that doesnât feel overly correct. 
    Should there be a hardware domain? 
    (Would the hazard stuff fit into it? Are there other things to go in? I donât have hardware experience to guess.)
    
    
    2. Migration theories. If you have a new element that could replace existing elements but donât have to, what do we want to recommend? You can, this is how, but you donât have to?
    
    
    Thanks,
    ZoÃ