Re: [dita] Integrate glossary reference domain into bookmap?

[Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>]

So, what are the implications for whether we integrate the glossary reference domain into bookmap ? 

Iâd think that a common glossary would be contained in a map, so no need for <glossarylist> to contain <glossref> ...

Kris

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@jeppesen.com> wrote:
> 
> ïA common glossary for a deliverable would make more sense at the bookmap level, than individual maps. This is especially true for terms that might be used across chapter maps.
> 
> --Scott
> 
> ïOn 10/7/19, 12:27 PM, "dita@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Kristen James Eberlein" <dita@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
>    Do we want to do this as part of the revised stage two proposal for bookmap?
> 
>    If so, what are the use cases that support adding the domain to bookmap?
> 
>    The one that I've heard so far is to be able to have <glossref> elements 
>    within <glossarylist> ... I'm not so sure about this, as I would think 
>    that most glossaries would be in maps or <glossgroup> topics.
> 
>    -- 
>    Best,
>    Kris
> 
>    Kristen James Eberlein
>    Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
>    Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
>    www.eberleinconsulting.com
>    +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
> 
> 
>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
>    generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>    https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.oasis-2Dopen.org_apps_org_workgroup_portal_my-5Fworkgroups.php&d=DwICaQ&c=P3aKjizb3qsxp0SERaL2sw&r=YQWdLfM9mekBOdoMmoBdn9RgyqIHrveGolBbb4_uGWQ&m=zmL_FFbBK6yV3DA_ZN-BVlx2clLvVREkHwih_x3L9C0&s=Rhwi23EbDpZu8fLraTHdWpa10lESnOGD_ExFkBJg_Wg&e=  
> 
> 
>