Re: [dita] Integrate glossary reference domain into bookmap?

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>]

I'm a little conflicted on this question. 

My instinct is to integrate on the principal of "why not, it could be useful" but on the other hand there are enough issues around the current glossary domain and glossaries in general that I would be hesitant to integrate glossary domain into Bookmap without some deeper general though around glossaries in general, which we haven't yet done.

Cheers,

E.
--
Eliot Kimber
http://contrext.com
 

ïOn 10/7/19, 1:27 PM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <dita@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:

    Do we want to do this as part of the revised stage two proposal for bookmap?
    
    If so, what are the use cases that support adding the domain to bookmap?
    
    The one that I've heard so far is to be able to have <glossref> elements 
    within <glossarylist> ... I'm not so sure about this, as I would think 
    that most glossaries would be in maps or <glossgroup> topics.
    
    -- 
    Best,
    Kris
    
    Kristen James Eberlein
    Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
    Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
    www.eberleinconsulting.com
    +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
    generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php