Re: [dita] DITA 2.0 terminology as glossary topics

[Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>]

I think it's an excellent idea. It's one that I've wished we would have effort to do for a long time.

I have a few topics that developed a while back, as as a glossgroup topic that holds the start of a laundry list. I have added them to the main repo under specification/glossary

The IBM Style Guide, which we use, has good and substantive advice about glossaries.

Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)

On 1/16/2020 8:35 AM, Dr. Stanley Doherty wrote:

> Hi Kris --
> Scott and I are volunteering to make this happen. Would it be possible to put this topic on a future TC meeting agenda for discussion?
> Thanx,
> Stan 
> =========================================
> I think it's a good idea and would be willing to help. We might discover some additional needs for glossary redesign this way, too.
>
> --Scott
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 14, 2020, at 7:24 AM, Dr. Stanley Doherty <stan@modularwriting.com> wrote:
> >
> > ïHi --
> >
> > I am completing a formal glossary of DITA terminology for an Oracle DITA authoring spec. As has been mentioned in TC meetings in the past, our own TC terminology resides in <dlentry>s in separate terminology topics, not in glossentry topics. 
> >
> > <topicref href="">
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >  <topicref href=""/>
> >    </topicref>
> >
> > Just testing the waters. Is it time to implement that same content in glossentry topics? If interest is there, I'll volunteer to work on it solo or with someone.
> >
> > What's the temperature in the room?
> >
> >
> >
> > Stan 
> >       
>