Allowing <draft-comment> in more places

[Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>]

Following up on an action item from today's TC call:

On 17 December, we discussed an e-mail on dita-comment. One of the requests was to allow <draft-comment> in <refbody>. We were OK with this, but deferred deciding how to handle -- bug fix was suggested -- until we had looked at the troubleshooting topic to see if there were elements in that structure that also needed <draft-comment>.

So, I think we are looking at permitting <draft-comment> in the following topic types/elements:

• reference/<refbody>
• troubleshooting/<remedy>

I can at least elaborate on the use case that I see for the troubleshooting topic:

• Allows a place to insert a <draft-comment> that applies to the <remedy> element, especially in the following circumstances:
• <remedy> constrained to remove <responsibleParty>
• <title> constrained to remove <draft-comment> and other elements
  

--
Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)