Hi
Robert,
I
have reviewed the PDF and I have no comments. Looks good to
me.
You
may wish to fix the PDF stylesheet to remove âOracle Cloud Infrastructureâ from the footers. It
should probably say âOASIS Openâ or whatever weâre supposed
to use nowadays.
Since
Iâll be late to the TC meeting, Iâm sending my feedback by
email.
Cheers,
Gershon
Gershon
JosephÂ|ÂSenior
Information Architect |ÂPrecision ContentÂ
Direct:Â+972 (54) 658-3887|ÂEmail:Âgershon@precisioncontent.comÂ|
www.precisioncontent.com
Â
Â
Unlock the
Knowledge in Your Enterpriseâ
This
email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing,
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.ÂPlease
notify us by return email if you have received this email
in error.ÂÂ2020,
Precision Content Authoring Solutions Inc, Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada
From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on
behalf of Robert Anderson
<robert.dan.anderson@oracle.com>
Date: Tuesday, 1 September 2020 at 0:21
To: "dita@lists.oasis-open.org"
<dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [dita] Stage 3 proposal: split syntax
diagrams from programming domain
Iâm
attaching the Stage 3 proposal for issue 361 to split syntax
diagrams (and now syntax phrases) from the programming
domain.
Â
Thanks to
Deb and Frank for reviews. Frank noted one thing, which is
that the domain token (syntaxdiagram-d) is more verbose than
many of the original ones (such as âpr-dâ that it used to
have). I tend to link the more verbose ones better in this
case, and it follows the pattern of more recent domain
tokens, such as âditavalref-dâ. We should discuss whether
others prefer a more abbreviated token in this case.
Â
Thanks,
Robert
Â