[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue #345 and the <abbreviated-form> element
I've gotten (very solid) reviews from each reviewer about #345, "New element for defining variable text." But we've uncovered an issue about the <abbreviated-form> that we need the TC to consider.
The DITA 1.3 rules for how processors resolve variable text start
with the following text:
" 1. For theÂ<abbreviated-form>
Âelement,
see the rules described inÂabbreviated-form."
1. If the <abbreviated-form> element references a
non-glossentry topic, render the title of the referenced topic.
(This conflicts with what is proposed in #345.)
ÂÂÂ If the <abbreviated-form> element references a
glossentry topic, go to #2.
2. If the <abbreviated-form> element is in an
"introductory context, go to #3.
ÂÂÂ If the <abbreviated-form> element is in a
"non-introductory context, go to #34.
3. Render the contents of the following elements, in the
specified order:
ÂÂ a. <glossSurfaceForm>
ÂÂ b. <glossterm>
4. Render the contents of the following elements, in the
specified order:
ÂÂ a. <glossAcronym>
ÂÂ b. <glossterm>
We do not define "introductory" or "non-introductory" contexts. In fact, we explicitly say "Note that the definition of an introductory context will differ for each deliverable format."
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]