[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in markup + xml mention domains
Is anyone on the TC using keref on these elements, or has clients that use them? I have never used these elements and wonder if anyone else does… If we (the TC) are not aware of any keyref usage, I’d rather update the
spec language and keep keyref out of them. Gershon Gershon Joseph | Senior Information Architect | Precision Content Unlock the Knowledge in Your Enterprise™
From:
dita@lists.oasis-open.org <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Robert Anderson <robert.dan.anderson@oracle.com> Hi, I've been making my way through the tech-comm updates making updates for DITA 2.0, and noticed an inconsistency in the DITA 1.3 spec. The <markupname> element (specialized from phrase) and the
XML mention elements (7 elements specialized from <markupname>) all state that they use the universal attributes + outputclass + keyref: However, in the DITA 1.3 vocabulary files, they don't define keyref: We need to fix this for DITA 2.0. Either of these options is valid for the new release; should we:
Thanks, Robert |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]