[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Future of jadetex (Was: First Open SourceDocumentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention
> Because there is a free "free as in free speech, not free as in free beer" > tool for DSSSL, which works on all Unices? same is true for XSL > And XSL implementations need a > non-free Java virtual machine or are too new/buggy? no, sorry, not so. there are XSLT implementations in C++ and Python, and there are free Javas (eg IBMs) >If you have documentation > to write *today*, DSSSL is the solution. i must beg to disagree > Also, if you don't write your stylesheets yourself, which is the most common > case for DocBook, DSSSL stylesheets are better debugged, better documented, > more robust, etc. thats true. > > > a) it perpetuates the writing of "style" in LaTeX > > Which does it and does it well, while DSSSL failed to produce something. if only LaTeX did do it well.... sebastian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC