[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: DOCTYPE for FO?
/ Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say: | Hi, | I noticed that the generated FO files don't have a DOCTYPE. Is there an | official one so I can edit with PSGML? I found one at | http://www.renderx.com/Tests/validator/fo2000.dtd. That one is pretty good, but there's no official one. | I thought it was reasonable that XSLT would translate XML from one | validatable form to another. It follows that XSL, being XML, should be | able to be validated. XSL FOs aren't easily amenable to (DTD) validation. Either you have to put every inheritable property on every element declaration (which makes a really unwieldy DTD) or you can't validate. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Greatness of soul is never http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | apparent, for it conceals itself; Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | a little originality is usually | all that shows. Greatness of soul | is more frequent than one would | suppose.--Stendhal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC