[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Any suggestions on Java problems? (with Saxon)
At 23:30 17/09/2001 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: >He insists on the future orientation of XSLT to let the users feel how >the standard will evolve, and to avoid that XSLT implementors make the >wrong choices, e.g. concerning the data types involved in processing a >stylesheet. But you don't *have* to use the 1.1 extensions surely? > > Concerning my own ability at implementing a correct XSLT processor, > > well you may not trust me, others do. > >You may admit that libxslt / libxml has just reached stability. Before >(a few monthes ago), it was not so, xsltproc crashed a lot (sorry for >not having reported the bugs BTW). Indeed you did a _very_ nice job. >And xsltproc is FAST!!! (I saw faster processing however using tools >like XSLT -> Java converters: once compiled, it is much faster than >anything else, even xsltproc ;) And considering that its only ??? months since Daniel announced, that's not a bad record is it? Until we get the OASIS compliance testing, I guess its still down to faith which is 'best for you', i.e. its a personal thing. <grin>I also like the fervour with which he supports the product</grin> Its like M$ supporting their biggest revenue earner! Regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC