[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Conceptual model for processing DocBook SGML andXML
--tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:40:14AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Hum, one of the thing which strikes me is that there is no > direct=20 > DocBook XML -> TeX > transformations. Basically they require going through FO where the > semantic is lost and only content/formatting is left, where then TeX > is generated. If you mean via PassiveTeX, it doesn't really produce any actual TeX. Tim. */ --tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8PA1ByaXy9qA00+cRAkScAJ4mgOLXd+G8Ptg0YULpGb9xKi3f6wCeJDJG dnknS4LvCdroZ0lWWBY8ewI= =kfLz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tZCmRiovzb4sxAVa--
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC