DOCBOOK-APPS: RE: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?

[David Cramer <dcramer@broadjump.com>]

This is a tools thread, so it should really be on docbook apps:
http://docbook.org/wiki/moin.cgi/DocBookAppsMailingList

I recall there's some information in this post:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook-apps/2002-q1/msg00726.html  (tho
I've only ever used PassiveTeX on linux--I tried, not very hard, to get
it working on windows once).

There's a list of fo renderers at
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/publishing.html#d
0e65. Add to that list Antenna house (commercial):
http://www.antennahouse.com/.  

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose [mailto:studio@qadram.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:31 PM
> To: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
> 
> 
> Hello Norman,
> 
> Friday, June 21, 2002, 5:53:06 PM, you wrote:
> 
> NW> |       I would prefer a Windows solution, but if I have 
> no choice, I
> NW> |       would use Linux.
> 
> NW> I think all of the possible tools can be made to work on Windows.
> 
> I'm using xsltproc and FOP to transform a DocBook document to PDF on
> Windows, but I have some problems with <programlisting> because all
> the source code is aligned to the right and some kind of justified.
> Another member of this list pointed me to use PassiveTex, but I think
> it's a Linux only solution, Can I run PassiveTex on Windows?, If so,
> could you tell me how?. There's another FOP processor for Windows?
> 
> Best Regards.