[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XEP for $80
Sorry if I gave the wrong impression. Its's just that this thread was discussing what we would get for $80. In terms of documentation, we get exactly the same we get in the Trial version, and that includes no Java API documentation, it comes only with the developer version ($1K). My evaluation had to be based on the information available _before_ buying the product. Since <floats>s are important to us, we will reconsider XEP in future evaluations when SVG support kicks in. ============================================= Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral Petrobrás (http://www.petrobras.com.br) mailto:jaccoud@petrobras.com.br voice: +55 21 2534-3485 fax: +55 21 2534-1809 ============================================= There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. David Tolpin <dvd@renderx.com> Para: jaccoud@petrobras.com.br cc: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org 16/10/2002 11:13 Assunto: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XEP for $80 > Nevertheless, "quite well" is a very subjective term. For some friends, > TEX's old file (which doesn't hyphenate any words with diacritics but > mostly works otherwise) is suitable. I had an extra job for being too > purist in orthographic matters, but with XEP I couldn't even start, since > we cannot correct or change its algorithm. Marcelo, if the current hyphenation class is not suitable for your needs you may write and plug in your own. Hyphenator is loaded into XEP through reflection, any hyphenation algorithm can be implemented. As you might have noticed, Java property com.renderx.xep.HYPHENATOR sets hyphenator to be com.renderx.xep.cmp.TeXHyphenator; the class's interface is well-defined and the functionality is easily extensible. To start using software consider looking at it and at the accompanying documentation. I really don't realize what all this hot air for. This is the first complain on hyphenation quality, complex words are seldom and well handled through exceptions, a standard feature of TeX hyphenation tables. TeX hyphenation tables are used for French, German, Russian, many European languages with diacritics, Hebrew. I've just finished preparing one for Armenian. The fact that one cannot prepare a hyphenation table for Portuese that handles diacritics does not mean the algorithm is not capable of handling it. Lack of hyphenation priorities in Liang's algorithms is well compensated by other techniques. It seems to me that your opinion is biased and not based upon a weighed estimate of the tool you are talking about. I really don't see where all this hot air comes from. David Tolpin RenderX
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC