Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: openjade vs. jade

[Yann Dirson <ydirson@fr.alcove.com>]

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:45:16PM +0100, A.R. (Tom) Peters wrote:
> openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/xml/3.1.7/docbook.cat:27:0:W: DTDDECL
> catalog entries are not supported
> openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/catalog:28:0:W:
> DTDDECL catalog entries are not supported
> 
> So openjade is not a drop-in replacement of jade?  Any caveats?
> What is going on, what might be wrong with DTDDECL's?

You're probably using an old version of openjade, linked against an
old opensp.  If you get openjade 1.3.2, built against opensp 1.5,
these messages should disappear, DTDDECL are now supported.

Note that jade does not support those, and just silently ignore them.

If you cannot upgrade, you can just filter those output lines.  The
runjade[1] script already does this accessory job, in addition to its
main purpose which is working around return code not being always set
by (open)jade.

[1] http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/*checkout*/alcovebook/sgml2x/bin/runjade?rev=1.3.2.1

	Note: I cannot find an HTTP request to the latest version on
	the stable branch, but this one is unlikely to change in the
	next months

-- 
Yann Dirson <Yann.Dirson@fr.alcove.com>                 http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support manager                Responsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant          Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer (dirson@debian.org)                        Développeur Debian