DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DocBook XSL 1.59.2 results fail with Fop 0.20.3

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| / Jeff Beal <jeff.beal@ansys.com> was heard to say:
| | The '*' unit is not, however, part of the FO specification.  Use <fo:column
| | column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/> for all three columns.
|
| Does that work in FOP now?

Jeff tells me it does, and indeed it does. 

Does it work in PassiveTeX? (If not, are the results worse than percentages?)

Does any one know of a formatter that *doesn't* handle proportional-column-width()?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | The Future Begins
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | Tomorrow!--Yoyodyne Propulsion
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | Systems
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+LsUzOyltUcwYWjsRAiKTAKCIiBjSurZTsqDt98BAnMB70fifGQCeJMl0
bCUI7IISqSleBB6e2ufi54o=
=iA+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----