DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using inline.monoseq in FO

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| Why is it a great problem? The result should be 90% of the paragraph
| size in the first case and 90% of the title size in the second.

And on further inspection, it just looks awful. Setting the font size
on the basis of "em"s is just wrong. It really should be based on
relative "ex" heights and those aren't available. I think I'll abandon
the crude attempt to make monospaced fonts look a little more
aesthetically sized.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | No man is more than another if he
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | does no more than
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | another.--Cervantes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+N9ZxOyltUcwYWjsRAuzQAJ4+WptpukG1mT55yzZG2+K1H8uCbQCfUvmK
ESqchAqD3z07FGlgxe/XaTY=
=HRYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----