Re: Support for callout extensions in xsltproc

[Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>]

>>>>> Jeff Beal <jeff.beal@ansys.com>:

> It shouldn't be very difficult at all.  As for which is preferable,
> Saxon seems to have been more stable for longer, and its performance
> is comparable to xsltproc's (for chunked HTML output) on my Windows
> 2000 machine.

Huh...?  Saxon has been _much_ slower(*) than xsltproc on all machines I
have been running them both.

I've been running them both on linux rather than Win32, but that
shouldn't make any difference.


- Steinar

(*) as doing in minutes what xsltproc does in seconds, on my old PII
233 at home