[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Experimental DocBook XSL V1.64.0 released
That is a PassiveTeX problem. Here is the comment regarding the change: revision 1.45 date: 2003/11/24 16:32:30; author: nwalsh; state: Exp; lines: +19 -7 Make sure that fo:list-item-body always contains an fo:block The XSL spec says that fo:list-item-body can only contain fo:block, so I suspect there were some kinds of listitem content that was not generating its own block. This change makes sure the fo output is conformant. It is common in the stylesheets to nest fo:blocks, and they should not generate any extra space unless there are properties on the block that specify such space. That's why I think this is a PassiveTeX problem. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises firstname.lastname@example.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justus H. Piater" <Justus.Piater@ULg.ac.be> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:09 AM Subject: [docbook-apps] Re: Experimental DocBook XSL V1.64.0 released <listitem> <para>...</para> </listitem> now generates two nested fo:blocks. This was not the case as of XSL V1.61.3; I have not tried the version(s) in-between. Why? This breaks PassiveTeX which creates an empty line before the text inside the para. I don't know what the FO spec says; this may well be a PassiveTeX problem. Justus -- Justus H. Piater, Ph.D. http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~piater/ Institut Montefiore, B28 Phone: +32-4-366-2279 Université de Liège, Belgium Fax: +32-4-366-2620 To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to firstname.lastname@example.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.