Re: [docbook-apps] Dealing with xml:base when processing ulinks to html

["Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net>]

Ah, just what I needed: a thorough set of test cases.  I'll fix up the
processing to pass all these tests.  Thanks for setting this up.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs@sagehill.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Yasskin" <jyasskin@gmail.com>
To: "Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net>
Cc: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Dealing with xml:base when processing ulinks to
html


> I've copied (most of) the tests from RFC2396 into
> http://jeffrey.yasskin.info/dump/base-test.xml. Run
> http://jeffrey.yasskin.info/dump/base-test.xslt on it to get the
> results at http://jeffrey.yasskin.info/dump/base-test.result. You'll
> have to change the imports in base-test.xslt to point to your local
> copies of the stylesheets.
>
> The processing is good enough for my purposes but I think can't be
> advertized as full xml:base support.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey
>
> % xsltproc --version
> Using libxml 20611, libxslt 10108 and libexslt 806
> xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20611, libxslt 10108 and libexslt 806
> libxslt 10108 was compiled against libxml 20611
> libexslt 806 was compiled against libxml 20611
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:54:14 -0700, Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> wrote:
> > Try the version of common/common.xsl in CVS now.  It wasn't recursing
like
> > it was supposed to.
> >
> > Also, if you are using xsltproc, be sure to use a version based on
libxml2
> > version 2.6.11 or later.  There was a bug in xml:base processing in
versions
> > before that.
>
>