[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Nested table: separator problem
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Stayton > I looked at the stylesheets and found that they were not > written to handle > nested tables. There are many instances where a template > refers its ancestor > tgroup or table, but does not select the closest ancestor. > That is what is > happening in your case. > > I asked Norm about this, and here is his response: > > "You can't nest CALS tables inside other CALS tables no matter > how much markup you put in between them. This used to be enforced with > exclusions in the SGML DTD but now I guess it should be enforced in > the stylesheets. And it should perhaps be mentioned in TDG, too! > I suggest adding a test in table.xsl that reports an error if > <table> or <informaltable> has an ancestor <table> or <informaltable>. > > The workaround for Bjoern is to use HTML tables." Maybe even easier would be to use <entrytbl>. With <entrytbl> instead of the nested <informaltable>, the FO output looks fine. /MJ
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]