[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ulink text properties in fo?
Hi Justus, I think you are right. The properties should go on an fo:inline inside the fo:basic-link. I have found that XEP and Antenna House both accept color on fo:basic-link and apply it to the text without error. But one shouldn't rely on non-standard behavior. 8^) Can you file a bug report on this at the SourceForge site? Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting firstname.lastname@example.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justus Piater" <Justus.Piater@ULg.ac.be> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 12:24 AM Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] ulink text properties in fo? Michèle Garoche <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:24:58 +0100: > <xsl:attribute-set name="xref.properties"> > <xsl:attribute name="color">blue</xsl:attribute> > </xsl:attribute-set> Yes, that's what I tried, but PassiveTeX does not pay attention to it. And indeed, if I understand the XSL-FO spec correctly (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice6.html#fo_basic-link), the color attribute does not apply to the fo:basic-link formatting object. Doesn't this mean that the link text should be enclosed, e.g., in a fo:inline that takes the appropriate text attributes? Justus -- Justus H. Piater, Ph.D. http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~piater/ Institut Montefiore, B28 Phone: +32-4-366-2279 Université de Liège, Belgium Fax: +32-4-366-2620