[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook Website 2.6.0 released
Hello! It might be, that autolayout.dtd was not changed, but it could be confusing for some users, that website 2.6.0 used autolayout 2.5.0. I think it would be better that all files share the same version number. This is a much cleaner approach. Btw, the header of website.dtd is <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE webpage PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website V2.6//EN" "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/website/2.6/schema/dtd/website.dtd"> but the files are under "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/website/2.6.0/schema/... Regards, Oliver Fischer Michael Smith wrote: > Oliver Fischer <obf@gmx.de> writes: > > >>1.) please check schema/dtd/autolayout.dtd >> >>There is written >> [...] >> >> Please use the following formal public identifier to identify it: >> >> "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Autolayout V2.5.0//EN" >> >>2.) xsl/autolayout.xsl contains: >> >><xsl:output method="xml" indent="no" >> doctype-public="-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website Autolayout > V2.5.0//EN" >> >>doctype-system="http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/website/2.5.0/schema/dtd/autolayout.dtd" > > > Is your concern that the 2.5.0 version number on autolayout.dtd > does not match the 2.6.0 version number for the release? > > The version number for autolayout.dtd was kept at 2.5.0 > intentionally. We made a decision to not change version numbers on > the Website DTDs for this release (and for future releases) > unless/until there actually changes to them. > > There have been no changes to autolayout.dtd since the 2.5.0 > release, so the version number was not changed. > > It is not necessary for the version numbers on autolayout.dtd and > layout.dtd to stay in sync with website.dtd and website-full.dtd. > The DTDs serve different purposes. > > --Mike >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]