[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: SGML to XML: Should I switch? How to switch?
On Jul 20, Javier Farreres (spanish@inicia.es) wrote: > Some replies to your questions: > > >Sadly to say, I have to stuck with "SGML" because until now; > >I still can not create a good PDF file with Ubuntu/Debian's > >"out of the box" tools (i.e. with no hacking/patching). > > > > > Hmmm, if you use SGML, creating pdf with OpenJade is quite easy. I do it > everyday. You just have to apt-get the adequate packages (openjade, > opensp, docbook-dsssl-stylesheets). Ditto. > But listen, you don't have to stay with SGML just for generating PDF. > You can use openjade tool with XML and generate PDF. It is wrong, as I > think I have read, that openjade is only for SGML. > > >It seems that the "XSL/FO path" is better maintained; but it is > >recommended not for non-tech fellows (like myself). > >Whereas the "DSSSL/jade/jadetex path" is more mature; > >but "not so" maintained anymore (?) > > > It is false that openjade is not maintained anymore. I am myself developing > openjade, and I plan to remove the jadetex tool in a near future making > openjade output pure tex. If I can, I will do it during august. And expect > more updates to come next year. And I maintain the Debian packages of OpenSP and OpenJade, which I spent the last few weeks getting these and other packages to compile under G++ 4.0, which is why I haven't had time to read this list until now. :-) New versions were recently uploaded to sid. If you find bugs using the Debian packages, file them (http://bugs.debian.org), then I will see them and help. Some of the other tools in Debian, e.g., docbook-utils, just call OpenJade under the covers, so if you have a problem with those, file a bug, and I might be able to help there, too. I fixed a bug in docbook-utils once that prevented it from working properly on XML files, though it worked on SGML files. It was quite simple to fix - unfortunately, some people probably gave up on using the tool for XML before I fixed the bug. I like the DSSSL toolchain because I can easily create HTML, PDF and RTF (for those annoying cases where someone tells me they need the document in MS Word). > ><Last try.../> > >Can anyone tell me exactly, what parameters should I > >use with jade/jadetex, to make "test.pdf" from "test.xml" ? This set of commands does the trick for me: openjade -t tex -d docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl declaration/xml.dcl foo.xml jadetex foo.tex jadetex foo.tex jadetex foo.tex dvipdf foo.dvi foo.pdf Like others, I have a makefile that I use. I believe jadetex has to be run multiple times because TeX needs to make multiple passes to get page numbering and such correct. > In Debian you have some directory with a lot of help about this. Try > this file in your debian box: > > /usr/share/doc/docbook-dsssl-doc/html/index.html > > I hope it helps. > > Javi > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org -- Neil Roeth
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]