refentry "source" versus "source-info"?

[Paul DuBois <paul@kitebird.com>]

common/refentry.xsl has a reference to "source-name":

<doc:template name="get.refentry.source.name" xmlns="">
  <refpurpose>Gets source-name metadata for a refentry</refpurpose>

  <refdescription>
    <para>A "source name" is one part of a (potentially) two-part
    <replaceable>Name</replaceable>&#160;<replaceable>Version</replaceable>
    source field. For more details, see the documentation for the
    <function>get.refentry.source</function> template.</para>
  </refdescription>
...

But then later down the code uses "source":

<xsl:template name="get.refentry.source.name">
  ...
      <xsl:choose>
        <xsl:when test="refmeta/refmiscinfo[@class = 'source']">
          <xsl:apply-templates
              select="refmeta/refmiscinfo[@class = 'source'][1]/node()"/>
        </xsl:when>
        <!-- * no <refmisc class="source"/> found, so we need to -->
        <!-- * check *info and parentinfo -->



The 1.69.0 part of the release notes file (man section) also
uses "source-name", in an example:

    The easiest way to control the contents of those fields is to mark up
your
    refentry content like the following (note that this is a "minimal"
    example).

      <refentry>
        <info>
          <date>2003-10-20</date> 1
        </info>
        <refmeta>
          <refentrytitle>gtk-options</refentrytitle> 2
          <manvolnum>7</manvolnum> 3
          <refmiscinfo class="source-name">GTK+</refmiscinfo> 4
          <refmiscinfo class="version">1.2</refmiscinfo> 5
          <refmiscinfo class="manual">GTK+ User's Manual</refmiscinfo> 6
        </refmeta>
        <refnamediv>
          <refname>gtk-options</refname>
          <refpurpose>Standard Command Line Options for GTK+
Programs</refpurpose>
        </refnamediv>
        <refsect1>
          <title>Description</title>
          <para>This manual page describes the command line options, which
          are common to all GTK+ based applications.</para>
        </refsect1>
      </refentry>


It looks to me that if you actually use class="source-name" as the
example suggests, the template in common/refentry.xsl will miss it?

Is there an inconsistency here regarding "source" versus "source-name"?